Skip to main content
Back to AI NewsNews

Sam Altman Says OpenAI Is Ready to Slow AI Development

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has stated the company is prepared to slow artificial intelligence development under certain conditions.

cueball EditorialFriday, 11 September 2026 3 min read

What Happened

OpenAI Chief Executive Sam Altman said the company is prepared to slow the pace of artificial intelligence development, according to a report published by Bloomberg on September 11, 2026. The statement marks a notable public position from the head of one of the world's most prominent AI laboratories at a moment when the broader industry is under sustained scrutiny over the speed of AI deployment.

Background

OpenAI, founded in 2015 and now among the most closely watched companies in technology, has been at the center of repeated debates over whether AI development is advancing faster than safety measures can keep pace. Altman has testified before the United States Congress and engaged with regulators in multiple jurisdictions on questions related to AI risk and governance.

The Bloomberg report was published in the outlet's AI Today newsletter, which covers artificial intelligence threats and opportunities for business and professional audiences. The report does not indicate that OpenAI has announced a formal change to its development timeline or product roadmap, but reflects Altman's stated willingness to adjust pace depending on circumstances.

What It Means in Practice

The Bloomberg report does not detail specific conditions under which OpenAI would reduce development speed, nor does it specify which products or research programs might be affected. Altman's comments appear to address concerns that have been raised by researchers, policymakers, and some within the AI industry itself about the risks associated with deploying increasingly capable models without sufficient safety evaluation.

The statement comes amid a broader period of public and regulatory attention on AI laboratories. Anthropic, a separate AI company, has faced scrutiny over the capabilities of its recently released Mythos model, with reporting from Fortune and RealClearDefense noting that the model's power has prompted discussion of both offensive and defensive security implications. The parallel activity across multiple AI companies has intensified calls from some quarters for coordinated governance frameworks.

OpenAI has also been managing separate controversies this week. The company claimed one of its AI models solved the Navier-Stokes equations, a set of mathematical problems tied to a one-million-dollar Millennium Prize. That claim has been met with plagiarism allegations from at least one mathematician, with disputes reported by Futurism and ColombiaOne.com, as well as questions about data privacy and research ethics reported by Mugglehead Investment Magazine. Those disputes are ongoing.

Company Position

OpenAI is privately held and was most recently reported to be in active fundraising discussions with investors, including Wall Street financial institutions, according to Fortune's September 11 technology briefing. The company's valuation has risen sharply over the past two years as demand for large language model access has grown across enterprise sectors.

Altman has previously described his approach to AI risk as one of cautious advancement, arguing that development by safety-focused organizations is preferable to ceding ground to developers with fewer safety commitments. His latest comments, as reported by Bloomberg, appear consistent with that framing while adding explicit acknowledgment that slower development is an option the company is willing to consider.

What Comes Next

Bloomberg has not indicated when Altman made the comments or in what forum, and OpenAI has not issued a formal policy statement on development pace as of the time of this report. Any formal commitments to specific safety benchmarks or development timelines would require announcement by the company or disclosure through regulatory filings.

Get our editors' take on what it all means. Read the Editor's Blog →